<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optiwind Compact Wind Accelerating Turbine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine</link>
	<description>Promoting a nation of Energy Locavores</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 16:18:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kent</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Torrington just made a very bad mistake... It caved in to special interests, and now it is going to be the proud owner of the ugliest windmill in America.... 

A new tourist attraction.  200 feet of trash, on what was once a beautiful hill.

Optiwind is no favorite in the city... and the opposition is growing, now that neighbors got a taste of the way they were treated in this process..

Pay close attention to the fact that the Optiwind design has never been tested... This is going to be a headline around here when this finally goes up.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Torrington just made a very bad mistake&#8230; It caved in to special interests, and now it is going to be the proud owner of the ugliest windmill in America&#8230;. </p>
<p>A new tourist attraction.  200 feet of trash, on what was once a beautiful hill.</p>
<p>Optiwind is no favorite in the city&#8230; and the opposition is growing, now that neighbors got a taste of the way they were treated in this process..</p>
<p>Pay close attention to the fact that the Optiwind design has never been tested&#8230; This is going to be a headline around here when this finally goes up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-196</guid>
		<description>By DAN IVERS

TORRINGTON — The Optiwind company cleared what was likely its biggest hurdle toward the eventual construction of a 199-foot wind turbine Wednesday night as the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission granted it a special zoning exception.

The proposal was unanimously approved with little discussion from the commission and no public comment. A public hearing was held June 10 with a majority of residents voicing their support for the plan.

The exception was needed because the turbine would be taller than standing zoning regulations allow in the area.

Optiwind will now construct a meteorological tower at the 725 Klug Hill Road site to gauge wind conditions there as they wait to obtain a building permit from the city.

“You just saw the ball go over the hill,” said Optiwind vice president David Hurwitt, who credited the Torrington Planning and Zoning Commission for the relatively painless process thus far. “I think the process was clearly defined.”

Earlier efforts by the company to build a turbine in neighboring Goshen failed as residents opposed the project.

The meteorological tower on Klug Hill Road will likely be put up within the next week, Hurwitt said.

George “Butch” Klug, a dairy farmer who owns the 167-acre property where the turbine will likely be constructed and has supported the proposed plan, said he was pleased by the ruling. The turbine will likely help create jobs in the area in addition to easing energy costs at his farm, he said.

Discussion from the Planning and Zoning board was limited before a motion to approve the exception was made, with City Planner Martin Connor reading a memo he had written supporting the move.

“In my opinion, the... requirements have been met,” he said.

Commission member Doris Murphy briefly expressed some concern over potential noise coming from the turbine, because Optiwind has not provided the city with data as to how loud it would actually be. But Chairman Richard Calkins said it shouldn’t be a concern, citing tests done by students at top engineering college Clarkson University.

“It’s never been tested full scale... but I’m comfortable with the results,” he said.

In any case, the resident who would be most affected by noise from the turbine would be Klug, who originally approached Optiwind about building it, he said.

Connor laid out the conditions of the approval prior to the vote, stipulating that in the event that the turbine is ever abandoned or no longer in use, the city must be properly notified and the structure removed.

Dan Ivers can be reached by e-mail at editor@registercitizen.com.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By DAN IVERS</p>
<p>TORRINGTON — The Optiwind company cleared what was likely its biggest hurdle toward the eventual construction of a 199-foot wind turbine Wednesday night as the city’s Planning and Zoning Commission granted it a special zoning exception.</p>
<p>The proposal was unanimously approved with little discussion from the commission and no public comment. A public hearing was held June 10 with a majority of residents voicing their support for the plan.</p>
<p>The exception was needed because the turbine would be taller than standing zoning regulations allow in the area.</p>
<p>Optiwind will now construct a meteorological tower at the 725 Klug Hill Road site to gauge wind conditions there as they wait to obtain a building permit from the city.</p>
<p>“You just saw the ball go over the hill,” said Optiwind vice president David Hurwitt, who credited the Torrington Planning and Zoning Commission for the relatively painless process thus far. “I think the process was clearly defined.”</p>
<p>Earlier efforts by the company to build a turbine in neighboring Goshen failed as residents opposed the project.</p>
<p>The meteorological tower on Klug Hill Road will likely be put up within the next week, Hurwitt said.</p>
<p>George “Butch” Klug, a dairy farmer who owns the 167-acre property where the turbine will likely be constructed and has supported the proposed plan, said he was pleased by the ruling. The turbine will likely help create jobs in the area in addition to easing energy costs at his farm, he said.</p>
<p>Discussion from the Planning and Zoning board was limited before a motion to approve the exception was made, with City Planner Martin Connor reading a memo he had written supporting the move.</p>
<p>“In my opinion, the&#8230; requirements have been met,” he said.</p>
<p>Commission member Doris Murphy briefly expressed some concern over potential noise coming from the turbine, because Optiwind has not provided the city with data as to how loud it would actually be. But Chairman Richard Calkins said it shouldn’t be a concern, citing tests done by students at top engineering college Clarkson University.</p>
<p>“It’s never been tested full scale&#8230; but I’m comfortable with the results,” he said.</p>
<p>In any case, the resident who would be most affected by noise from the turbine would be Klug, who originally approached Optiwind about building it, he said.</p>
<p>Connor laid out the conditions of the approval prior to the vote, stipulating that in the event that the turbine is ever abandoned or no longer in use, the city must be properly notified and the structure removed.</p>
<p>Dan Ivers can be reached by e-mail at <a href="mailto:editor@registercitizen.com">editor@registercitizen.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stop This Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-173</link>
		<dc:creator>Stop This Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 00:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-173</guid>
		<description>Everyone makes excuses for bad engineering and design.

Let the market decide.... Sounds like it already has.... Optiwind defeated because of ugly design.

Let&#039;s not worry about it.

We have plenty of better designs to consider and then there is solar technology, the ultimate winner to be in all of this.

You do have to admit this thing is unbelievably ugly.  It looks like a giant emergency siren.

No one is going to want to be anywhere near this thing.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone makes excuses for bad engineering and design.</p>
<p>Let the market decide&#8230;. Sounds like it already has&#8230;. Optiwind defeated because of ugly design.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s not worry about it.</p>
<p>We have plenty of better designs to consider and then there is solar technology, the ultimate winner to be in all of this.</p>
<p>You do have to admit this thing is unbelievably ugly.  It looks like a giant emergency siren.</p>
<p>No one is going to want to be anywhere near this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I would have to agree with Stephanie. The plain reality is that the traditional 3 bladed wind turbines cannot work everywhere. They often require a very substantial wind and need to be very large , sometimes 600 ft tall with 300 ft blades, to work efficiently. It seems this company has created a way to allow more areas to have wind power. That being said this country needs distributed alternative energy sources all over the country not just the heartland. I say we look at our future as a so our kids and grandkids can live in a place where yes there might be a visual distraction but at least they can breathe clean air and don&#039;t have to God forbid watch their brother and sister die on foreign soil over oil. 
	We all need to think long term and as American lets lead the way, regardless of what china and the rest of the world is doing.. let them fight over the oil and let them pay the high prices. If we don&#039;t change our ways soon we won&#039;t even care about visual appeal because we won&#039;t be able to see through the smog, and pollution. Let the US be independent again, it is my hope that one day all of our energy will come from here and not overseas.  GO GREEN or GO TO THE MIDDLE EAST

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have to agree with Stephanie. The plain reality is that the traditional 3 bladed wind turbines cannot work everywhere. They often require a very substantial wind and need to be very large , sometimes 600 ft tall with 300 ft blades, to work efficiently. It seems this company has created a way to allow more areas to have wind power. That being said this country needs distributed alternative energy sources all over the country not just the heartland. I say we look at our future as a so our kids and grandkids can live in a place where yes there might be a visual distraction but at least they can breathe clean air and don&#8217;t have to God forbid watch their brother and sister die on foreign soil over oil.<br />
	We all need to think long term and as American lets lead the way, regardless of what china and the rest of the world is doing.. let them fight over the oil and let them pay the high prices. If we don&#8217;t change our ways soon we won&#8217;t even care about visual appeal because we won&#8217;t be able to see through the smog, and pollution. Let the US be independent again, it is my hope that one day all of our energy will come from here and not overseas.  GO GREEN or GO TO THE MIDDLE EAST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Go Goshen!</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Go Goshen!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 18:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Goshen made the right call based on the majority of the comments above.

Once I looked at the images included here, I couldn&#039;t believe they were actually going to give Optiiwind a permit for that thing.  Anything is possible these days when money is involved.

Go Goshen!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Goshen made the right call based on the majority of the comments above.</p>
<p>Once I looked at the images included here, I couldn&#8217;t believe they were actually going to give Optiiwind a permit for that thing.  Anything is possible these days when money is involved.</p>
<p>Go Goshen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goshen Votes NO -  5-0</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-165</link>
		<dc:creator>Goshen Votes NO -  5-0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-165</guid>
		<description>Yesterday, the Planning Board in Goshen rejected Optiwind&#039;s permit request to construct one of its windmills in the town.  The vote was &quot;unanimous&quot; -   5 to 0 -  to reject the request!

The reason the permit was overwhelmingly rejected, was because the Optiwind design would have had an adverse affect on the property values and the character of the neighborhood.

This should pretty much close the argument above about what&#039;s important in a windmill design.   It needs to fit into the landscape.

It cannot be an eyesore.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, the Planning Board in Goshen rejected Optiwind&#8217;s permit request to construct one of its windmills in the town.  The vote was &#8220;unanimous&#8221; &#8211;   5 to 0 &#8211;  to reject the request!</p>
<p>The reason the permit was overwhelmingly rejected, was because the Optiwind design would have had an adverse affect on the property values and the character of the neighborhood.</p>
<p>This should pretty much close the argument above about what&#8217;s important in a windmill design.   It needs to fit into the landscape.</p>
<p>It cannot be an eyesore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff from Goshen</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff from Goshen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 13:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I also attended the speaking session in Connecticut that Amy T described above, where Optiwind&#039;s CEO presented his concept.

You should have heard the snikering in the crowd.... and some laughs.

Just about everyone I spoke with remarked about how huge and intrusive the design is, and how difficult it would be to get it past a zoning board, let alone public acceptance.

This is just another technically focused company that rejects the &quot;total design&quot; philosophy which says a design must fit well in all its primary aspects to be competitive.... Here, Optiwind just rejects public&#039;s sentiment over the need for a favorable appearance...  

In Goshen, the neighbors are fighting hard to keep Optiwind out.....  I can see why.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also attended the speaking session in Connecticut that Amy T described above, where Optiwind&#8217;s CEO presented his concept.</p>
<p>You should have heard the snikering in the crowd&#8230;. and some laughs.</p>
<p>Just about everyone I spoke with remarked about how huge and intrusive the design is, and how difficult it would be to get it past a zoning board, let alone public acceptance.</p>
<p>This is just another technically focused company that rejects the &#8220;total design&#8221; philosophy which says a design must fit well in all its primary aspects to be competitive&#8230;. Here, Optiwind just rejects public&#8217;s sentiment over the need for a favorable appearance&#8230;  </p>
<p>In Goshen, the neighbors are fighting hard to keep Optiwind out&#8230;..  I can see why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gail T</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>Gail T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 22:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-163</guid>
		<description>We have been working on alternative energy projects for our local high school for the past three years.  Last year we installed our first solar energy projevct on our gymnasium roof and got rave reviews.  We are going to install a phase two project next year.  The solar panels we chose blend neatly into the roof structure and that is a big part of achieving overwhelming community acceptance and support for phase two.  You do need to consider aestetics when selecting an energy system.

After seeing what Optiwind has been designing, I am very confident we made the right selection.  I cannot imagine something like that placed beside our school.  Optiwind has missed something very important here.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been working on alternative energy projects for our local high school for the past three years.  Last year we installed our first solar energy projevct on our gymnasium roof and got rave reviews.  We are going to install a phase two project next year.  The solar panels we chose blend neatly into the roof structure and that is a big part of achieving overwhelming community acceptance and support for phase two.  You do need to consider aestetics when selecting an energy system.</p>
<p>After seeing what Optiwind has been designing, I am very confident we made the right selection.  I cannot imagine something like that placed beside our school.  Optiwind has missed something very important here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sun Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Sun Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-162</guid>
		<description>For all of you who think Solar is the more expensive option, get ready for some surprises.  The cost of Solar is going to drop by 30-50% per year for the next ten years, due to evolving technology and manufacturing improvements.  This is not true for wind.  In fact, the price for wind is going up, due to materials costs.  Long term it&#039;s going to be solar... And it looks a lot better, and requires no maintenance!  

Have you ever seen a wind farm?  Gosh!   

I can only imagine an Optiwind - wind farm..... Gosh squared!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all of you who think Solar is the more expensive option, get ready for some surprises.  The cost of Solar is going to drop by 30-50% per year for the next ten years, due to evolving technology and manufacturing improvements.  This is not true for wind.  In fact, the price for wind is going up, due to materials costs.  Long term it&#8217;s going to be solar&#8230; And it looks a lot better, and requires no maintenance!  </p>
<p>Have you ever seen a wind farm?  Gosh!   </p>
<p>I can only imagine an Optiwind &#8211; wind farm&#8230;.. Gosh squared!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fact versus Theory - Count the Chickens</title>
		<link>http://www.buildbabybuild.com/uncategorized/optiwind-compact-wind-accelerating-turbine/comment-page-1#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Fact versus Theory - Count the Chickens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 17:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.buildbabybuild.com/?p=1711#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s a good idea for someone to come forward, and put some &quot;facts&quot; down before we count all those &quot;chickens&quot;.

Fact:  Optiwind has never built one of these things, and only assumes it won&#039;t need a lot of maintenance.  The other windmill vendors also thought they didn&#039;t need much maintenance, that is until they actually built one.  Optiwind is due for some surprises as well.

Fact:  Optiwind calculates cost versus solar systems based on theory.  Again, they have never built one.  According to the company, they have built a &quot;two foot high model&quot; that represents their tests... What a joke.  Build one, and then come tell us how much it actuially costs.

Fact:  The Optiwind design is particularly ugly.  The company keeps saying that doesn&#039;t matter.  The neighbors and the public says it does.  They do not have issue with traditional windmills.

Fact:  Optiwind is backed by a rich Boston finance company with tons of money which they use to push neighbors around who disagree with them.  So who is acting like the &quot;greedy rich&quot; in Goshen?

Fact:  Residents of Goshen, CT are working hard to keep Optiwind from building their ugly windmill in their town.  These are residents who are already using alternative energy systems, and who respect the environment.  They have put their money where their mouth is.  Why are they fighting so hard?  The Optiwind design is really ugly!

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s a good idea for someone to come forward, and put some &#8220;facts&#8221; down before we count all those &#8220;chickens&#8221;.</p>
<p>Fact:  Optiwind has never built one of these things, and only assumes it won&#8217;t need a lot of maintenance.  The other windmill vendors also thought they didn&#8217;t need much maintenance, that is until they actually built one.  Optiwind is due for some surprises as well.</p>
<p>Fact:  Optiwind calculates cost versus solar systems based on theory.  Again, they have never built one.  According to the company, they have built a &#8220;two foot high model&#8221; that represents their tests&#8230; What a joke.  Build one, and then come tell us how much it actuially costs.</p>
<p>Fact:  The Optiwind design is particularly ugly.  The company keeps saying that doesn&#8217;t matter.  The neighbors and the public says it does.  They do not have issue with traditional windmills.</p>
<p>Fact:  Optiwind is backed by a rich Boston finance company with tons of money which they use to push neighbors around who disagree with them.  So who is acting like the &#8220;greedy rich&#8221; in Goshen?</p>
<p>Fact:  Residents of Goshen, CT are working hard to keep Optiwind from building their ugly windmill in their town.  These are residents who are already using alternative energy systems, and who respect the environment.  They have put their money where their mouth is.  Why are they fighting so hard?  The Optiwind design is really ugly!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
